Dakota
Swann
808
Banned Books
Argument Essay
One reason why the
book should not be limited is because some teenagers may relate to what the main Character Hazel is
going through as a teenager with cancer. The article “Darkness Too Visible”
states “Reading about another teen in the same traits will be comforting.” This
quote explains that the kid may feel that they are not alone and other
teenagers are going through what they are going through. This could be good for
the reader’s feelings or their emotions. Also you don’t have to be mature
enough to read about someone’s feelings and emotions.
Another reason why the
book should not be limited is because the book teaches a life lesson that the
readers may need later in life. The article “The Banned Books We’ve Loved” states
that “The books that we want to ban teach us the most valuable lessons.” So if
we ban these books we are banning the life lessons that the kids want to learn.
And we want teenagers to learn lessons. We can’t ban these books because of one
sexual reference which is not the
overall point to the story.
Many may argue that the
book should be ban because one chapter in the book has one part that has a sexual
reference. The book contains that sexual
part but it is not detailed enough for the reader to really picture the whole
scene clearly. The sexual part is only one page and a half. It explains when
Augustus took off his leg and Hazel asking him questions about it and it fast
forward so that we don’t have to hear the real sexual parts.
In conclusion the
book “The Fault of Our Stars” should not be limited because it may let kids or
teenagers relate to the story and the book can teach the reader a life lesson.
It can also teach people about the life of a kid or teenager with cancer. Some
people should think twice before thinking about banning a book that many people
love.